Martin Landaluce vs Oliver Crawford Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Oct at 03:46 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Landaluce vs O. Crawford

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Landaluce 1 - 0 Crawford
They have played 2 sets in total, with Martin Landaluce winning 2 and Oliver Crawford winning 0. The last match between Martin Landaluce and Oliver Crawford was at the Villena Challenger, 02-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Martin Landaluce getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Landaluce | 1 |
| Crawford | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Villena Challenger(10-02-25)
M. Landaluce vs O. Crawford H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $301,960 | Career Prize Money | $57,200 |
| 56.15% (105-82) | Career Total W/L | 68.34% (326-151) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 13 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 16.67% (1-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-1) |
M. Landaluce vs O. Crawford Match Preview:
- In recent months, Oliver Crawford outperformed Martin Landaluce on second serves, securing 46.02% of points compared to Landaluce's 42.42%. Could this be a tipping point in the match? It very well could be.
- On the return game, Crawford barely leads, capturing 46.04% of opponent second serves, slightly more than Landaluce’s 45.40%. First serve returns, however, show Landaluce ahead with 26.80% over Crawford's 25.70%.
- Under pressure, Martin Landaluce demonstrated resilience by saving 54.66% of breakpoints, which edges out Crawford’s 52.57%.
- Over the past year, Crawford boasts a stronger win rate at 75.00% (63 wins, 21 losses) versus Landaluce’s 60.53% (46 wins, 30 losses).
- Their best playing surfaces differ: Crawford excels on Hard courts with a 71% win rate, while Landaluce shines on Grass, also with a 71% win rate.
- When considering match difficulty, Crawford has mostly faced lower-ranked opponents (average rank 414.05) compared to Landaluce’s tougher competition (average rank 206.84).
- Crawford is slightly more successful in deciding sets, winning 66% compared to Landaluce's 65%.
Editorial Prediction (October 2, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing the recent stats, Oliver Crawford demonstrates a slight edge in several areas of play. His dominance on second serves and overall stronger winning percentage over the past year suggests a competitive advantage.
While Landaluce showcases a noteworthy performance in saving breakpoints and facing more challenging opponents, Crawford's consistency on his preferred surfaces and success in deciding sets give him a marginal uptick in reliability.
Considering the accumulated data, Oliver Crawford appears to be the probable winner in this upcoming matchup, although Martin Landaluce's resilience and competitive edge should not be underestimated.
Martin Landaluce vs Oliver Crawford Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Landaluce vs O. Crawford H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:33:31 | Average Match Time | 1:33:31 |
| 61% (42/69) | 1st Serve % | 64% (35/55) |
| 71% (30/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (20/35) |
| 41% (11/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (9/20) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (3/6) |
| 47% (26/55) | Return Points Win % | 41% (28/69) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Landaluce Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
SF | L | 6-2 3-6 6-3 | ||
QF | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 7-5 | ||
O. Crawford Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-7(10) 6-3 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 6-7(1) 6-4 7-6(7) | ||
QF | L | 6-7(3) 6-4 7-5 | ||
R2 | W | 7-6(6) 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(7) 1-6 7-6(3) | ||

M. Landaluce vs O. Crawford Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.15% (105/82) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.34% (326/151) |
| 53.66% (242/209) | Sets Win/Loss | 64.61% (701/384) |
| 51.46% (2227/2101) | Games Win/Loss | 56.14% (5599/4375) |
| 62.65% (52/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 69.65% (140/61) |
| 47.22% (34/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 68.48% (176/81) |
| 55.00% (11/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 66.67% (8/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 53.85% (7/6) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 728 | Aces Total | 1199 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.2 |
| 767 | Total Double Faults | 980 |
| 1:53:7 | Average Match Time | 1:32:34 |
| 316.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 444.83 |
| 63% (8623/13792) | 1st Serve % | 63% (18035/28555) |
| 69% (5961/8623) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (12368/18035) |
| 49% (2533/5169) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (5571/10520) |
| 40% (570/1429) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1364/3011) |
| 40% (5573/13976) | Return Points Win % | 41% (11577/28050) |
| 63.64% (7/4) | Slam W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 44.44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 58.26% (67/48) | Challenger W/L | 51.28% (60/57) |
| 64.29% (27/15) | Futures W/L | 75.36% (263/86) |
| 57% (104/184) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 69% (319/465) |
| 33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 20% (1/5) |
| 44% (28/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (71/126) |
| 57% (42/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 61% (81/132) |
| 84% (100/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (313/284) |
| 16% (100/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (313/29) |
| 24% (87/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 25% (164/41) |